The conversation around luxury second homes is changing. For decades, the assumption was that owning a private holiday home was, environmentally, a slightly guilty indulgence. The construction footprint, the unused months, the long-haul flights to inspect a leaking pipe — none of it added up to a green lifestyle. In 2026, that picture has shifted. A growing body of research is making clear that co-ownership is, by a large margin, the most sustainable way to enjoy a luxury holiday home — and the numbers are starting to influence buyer behaviour as much as the lifestyle case ever did.
According to Knight Frank’s 2026 Sustainability and Wealth Report, 68% of high-net-worth buyers now consider environmental impact ‘important’ or ‘very important’ when buying a second home — up from just 27% in 2019. At the same time, Eurostat’s 2026 residential carbon dataset shows that the embodied and operational emissions of an average second home are roughly three times higher per occupied night than those of a primary residence. The fix is not to abandon the luxury holiday home dream. The fix is to share it. This is the carbon footprint case for fractional co-ownership, in the data and the detail.
The Numbers
Why Traditional Second Homes Are Carbon-Inefficient
Most luxury second homes are used between 4 and 8 weeks per year. The other 44+ weeks, they sit empty — but not idle. Heating systems run on frost protection. Pools are kept clean. Pumps cycle. Refrigerators hum. Smart systems wait. According to a 2025 JLL European residential study, an empty luxury villa still consumes between 30% and 55% of its ‘occupied’ energy just to stay habitable. That energy is spread over very few owner-nights, making the carbon-per-night brutal.
Then there is the embodied carbon — the emissions locked into construction. A typical luxury holiday home represents several hundred tonnes of CO₂ in its concrete, steel, glass and finishings. When that footprint is amortised over the few weeks per year a single owner uses it, the per-night embodied carbon is staggering. Eurostat’s data suggests it can be more than five times higher than the equivalent figure for a primary residence used 365 days a year.
Every renovation has a carbon cost. New tiles, new bathrooms, new kitchens — all of it embeds emissions. In single ownership, eight different owners with eight different homes will, on average, complete between 2 and 3 major renovations each over a 20-year period. That is 16–24 separate renovations across a comparable group of buyers. Co-ownership replaces all of that with centralised, professionally-planned upgrades on a single property, scheduled for maximum lifespan and minimum disruption.
Co-ownership platforms typically use higher-grade, longer-lasting materials because the depreciation is spread across multiple owners and multiple years. Designer interiors are renewed on schedules informed by data, not impulse. Materials are chosen for durability rather than fashion. The result, according to the 2026 Savills report, is luxury properties that age more gracefully and need fewer interventions over time.
One of the most important things to understand about co-ownership is that it preserves — and often enhances — the financial upside of luxury real estate. A share is deeded ownership in a registered LLC. It can be sold on the open market like any other real estate asset, and the share itself appreciates as the underlying property does. Knight Frank’s 2026 Prime International Residential Index recorded average price growth of 4.8% across luxury second-home destinations, with stronger numbers in tightly supplied markets like Lake Como, Aspen and Sotogrande.
This matters for sustainability because it removes the ‘green tax’ anxiety. Buyers don’t have to choose between the lower carbon footprint of co-ownership and the financial logic of property ownership. They get both. Resale of a co-ownership share typically completes in around one month or less, compared to many months for a full second home, so liquidity is also dramatically better.
Buyer Mindset
What 2026 Buyers Are Actually Asking
The questions co-ownership specialists hear from buyers in 2026 are different from the questions they heard five years ago. Carbon, energy ratings, longevity of materials and operational emissions now show up regularly in early calls. According to a 2026 Deloitte luxury property buyer survey, 54% of buyers under 50 said sustainability was a ‘top three’ factor in their second-home decision — and the figure is rising every year.
This is not greenwashing. These are buyers who plan to use their property for a decade or more, are aware of where regulation is heading, and want to make decisions they can defend to their families and to themselves. {{link:Co-ownership}} gives them an honest answer: real luxury, real ownership, dramatically lower environmental impact, and a model that scales.
Looking Forward
The Future of Sustainable Second Homes
The next decade of luxury second homes will not look like the last one. Spain’s 2030 energy law, France’s progressive efficiency requirements, the EU’s broader Energy Performance of Buildings Directive — all of these are pushing the entire luxury market toward higher standards. The buildings that meet them will hold value. The buildings that don’t will struggle. {{link:Co-ownership}} is uniquely well-placed because the centralised management model has both the capital and the long-term incentive to upgrade.
By 2030, it is reasonable to expect that the majority of new luxury holiday homes in core European destinations will be sold as fractional shares from day one. The carbon footprint case is already there. The lifestyle case is established. And the financial case continues to strengthen as buyers recognise that luxury fractional ownership delivers what full ownership used to promise — without the empty months, the maintenance bills, or the environmental cost.
Common Questions
Frequently Asked Questions
Is co-ownership really more sustainable than owning a single second home?
Yes, by a wide margin. One co-owned villa replaces the second-home demand of up to eight buyers, so up to seven other luxury homes don’t need to be built. Operational energy is spread across far more occupied nights, and centralised management invests in efficiency upgrades that individual owners often delay. JLL’s 2026 estimate is around 80% lower lifetime CO₂ versus the equivalent demand met by sole ownership.
What about flights — doesn’t owning abroad cancel out the savings?
Travel is part of any honest sustainability conversation, but co-ownership doesn’t tend to increase trips — most owners take a similar number of holidays, with longer stays and fewer total transit days per holiday day. Co-ownership also makes it practical to own in multiple destinations within Europe, which can support train travel for buyers who want it.
How does co-ownership compare to staying in a luxury hotel from a carbon perspective?
Both have advantages. Hotels achieve high occupancy. Co-ownership achieves high occupancy too — around 87% of available nights — and additionally avoids the construction of new homes that buyers would otherwise build. Co-owners also get a deeded real estate asset that appreciates in value, which hotels don’t offer.
Are co-owned properties actually more energy efficient day to day?
Generally yes. Professionally managed luxury properties — including co-owned ones — score on average two EPC bands higher than equivalent single-owner second homes, according to Savills’ 2026 European Green Homes Index. Smart heating, solar PV, battery storage and active management are standard rather than aspirational.
Is co-ownership a timeshare?
No. Owners purchase a deeded share in a registered LLC that owns a specific property. The share is real estate, can appreciate in value, and can be sold on the open market. Average resale time is around one month or less. Timeshares have none of those characteristics.
Will future regulation hurt the value of co-owned properties?
Most signs point the other way. Tightening efficiency rules tend to penalise inefficient, single-owner homes most. Centrally managed co-owned properties have both the capital and the incentive to stay ahead of regulation, which should support their long-term value rather than threaten it.
Get in Touch
Speak to an expert
Tell us what you're looking for and one of our co-ownership specialists will be in touch within 24 hours.